Skip to main content

Abstract of "Advanced PostgreSQL, part 1"

In December, Fujitsu made available a video of Gavin Sherry speaking on Advanced PostgreSQL. (Where's part 2, guys?) Here's some of the topics Gavin addresses, and the approximate point at which they can be found in the video.

[start]
wal_buffers: "at least 64"; when it's ok to turn fsync off [not very often]; how hard disk rpm limits write-based transaction rate, even with WAL
00:12:
wal_sync_method = fdatasync is worth checking out on Linux
00:13:
FSM [free space map], MVCC, and vacuum; how to determine appropriate FSM size; why this is important to avoid VACUUM FULL
00:22:
vaccum_cost_delay
00:26:
background writer
00:30:
history of buffer replacement strategies
00:37:
scenarios where bgwriter is not useful
00:41:
how random_page_cost affects planner's use of indexes
00:47:
effective_cache_size
00:49:
logging; how to configure syslog to not hose your performance
00:52:
linux file system configuration
00:58:
solaris fs config
1:02:
raid; reliability; sata/scsi; battery-backed cache ("for $100, you can triple the write throughput of your system")
1:08:
tablespaces
1:12:
increasing pgsql_tmp performance for queries that exceed work_mem and how to tell if this is worth worrying about
1:15:40
cpu considerations

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why schema definition belongs in the database

Earlier, I wrote about how ORM developers shouldn't try to re-invent SQL . It doesn't need to be done, and you're not likely to end up with an actual improvement. SQL may be designed by committee, but it's also been refined from thousands if not millions of man-years of database experience. The same applies to DDL. (Data Definition Langage -- the part of the SQL standard that deals with CREATE and ALTER.) Unfortunately, a number of Python ORMs are trying to replace DDL with a homegrown Python API. This is a Bad Thing. There are at least four reasons why: Standards compliance Completeness Maintainability Beauty Standards compliance SQL DDL is a standard. That means if you want something more sophisticated than Emacs, you can choose any of half a dozen modeling tools like ERwin or ER/Studio to generate and edit your DDL. The Python data definition APIs, by contrast, aren't even compatibile with other Python tools. You can't take a table definition

Python at Mozy.com

At my day job, I write code for a company called Berkeley Data Systems. (They found me through this blog, actually. It's been a good place to work.) Our first product is free online backup at mozy.com . Our second beta release was yesterday; the obvious problems have been fixed, so I feel reasonably good about blogging about it. Our back end, which is the most algorithmically complex part -- as opposed to fighting-Microsoft-APIs complex, as we have to in our desktop client -- is 90% in python with one C extension for speed. We (well, they, since I wasn't at the company at that point) initially chose Python for speed of development, and it's definitely fulfilled that expectation. (It's also lived up to its reputation for readability, in that the Python code has had 3 different developers -- in serial -- with very quick ramp-ups in each case. Python's succinctness and and one-obvious-way-to-do-it philosophy played a big part in this.) If you try it out, pleas

A review of 6 Python IDEs

(March 2006: you may also be interested the updated review I did for PyCon -- http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html .) For September's meeting, the Utah Python User Group hosted an IDE shootout. 5 presenters reviewed 6 IDEs: PyDev 0.9.8.1 Eric3 3.7.1 Boa Constructor 0.4.4 BlackAdder 1.1 Komodo 3.1 Wing IDE 2.0.3 (The windows version was tested for all but Eric3, which was tested on Linux. Eric3 is based on Qt, which basically means you can't run it on Windows unless you've shelled out $$$ for a commerical Qt license, since there is no GPL version of Qt for Windows. Yes, there's Qt Free , but that's not exactly production-ready software.) Perhaps the most notable IDEs not included are SPE and DrPython. Alas, nobody had time to review these, but if you're looking for a free IDE perhaps you should include these in your search, because PyDev was the only one of the 3 free ones that we'd consider using. And if you aren