Skip to main content

Spyce testimonials

Since the Daily Python URL was kind enough to link to the 2.0.3 announcement, I thought a few testimonials might be in order. :)
I tried downloading, installing and using Spyce 2.0.2 on Windows and Linux yesterday and it worked like a dream. I have already set up a useful little dynamic site on a linux box and plan to expand it radically in the weeks ahead. I am using Spyce in webserver mode and also using the scheduler to trigger periodic repository updates.
    --Rock Howard
Spyce is really speeding up my "project"... at this rate, I'll be ready for pre-beta testing in about two months. I'm utterly addicted to encapsulation via active tags.
    --Tim Lesher
(Not to pick on them since they do have a nice framework, but Tim was formerly using CherryPy. Most recently, anyway.)

Comments

Anonymous said…
Here is an update: I have created and deployed 5 Spyce-based apps incorporating 15 spy pages as well as an extended version of the "ToDo List" demo application. I did this in 7 weeks starting from scratch. Two of the apps are already in active use on 2 continents (with 2 more continents to be added soon.)

I still consider myself a Spyce neophyte, but the bottom-line is that Spyce has enabled me to realize the python advantage of rapid development in the realm of dynamic web-based apps.

-- Rock
11:03 AM
sahir said…
I have checked lots of python webframework (django,turbogears2,cherrypy,zope,web2py and lots other on python site : http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks)

My requirement was very simple:

1. Python version 2.5+ (for our leagacy code)
2. No MVC framework (wanted raw control, minimum setup requirement,easy to deploy,wanted to create own directory structure).
3.Easy to deploy.
4.Basic web object requirement(response,request,session,form handling,database operation)
5.Own autentication module.
6. Should work on windows and unix/linux.
7.Able to work with Apache 2.2 or lighttpd.
8.Easy to integrate AJAX.

And all of the above requirements
fitted only one and that was none other than "SPYCE"


More I invested time to look into "SPYCE" framework more I loved it.

I have created scalable and loosely coupled AJAX-JQUERY solution within short period of time.

Lots of Thanks to "SPYCERS" who created this lovely framework.

Spyce has given me herculean strenght for python web development.

Feel free to ask me regarding my experice with my beloved Python framework at sksahir @ gmail .com


Sahir
(Pune-India)
3:12 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PyCon Python IDE review

I presented an IDE review at PyCon last Friday. It was basically a re-review of what I thought were the 3 most promising IDEs from the Utah Python User Group IDE review , to which I added SPE, which was by far the most popular of the ones we left out that time. The versions reviewed are: PyDev 1.0.2 SPE 0.8.2.a Komodo 3.5.2 Wing IDE 2.1 beta 1 I'd intended to base my presentation around a comparison of writing a smallish program in each of the IDEs, but the more I tried to make this not suck, the more I realized it was a losing proposition. Instead, I decided to try to focus on the features in each that most set them apart from the others (both positive and negative); this seemed more likely be useful. (I did a new feature matrix for this review, which is included after my comments. The slides I used are also up, at http://utahpython.org/jellis/pycon-ides.pdf , but aren't very useful absent video of the presentation itself. Hence this post.) PyDev PyDev has g...
43 comments
Read more

Why PHP sucks

(July 8 2005) Apparently I got linked by some PHP sites, and while there were a few well-reasoned comments here I mostly just got people who only knew PHP reacting like I told them their firstborn was ugly. These people tended to give variants on one or more themes: All environments have warts, so PHP is no worse than anything else in this respect I can work around PHP's problems, ergo they are not really problems You aren't experienced enough in PHP to judge it yet As to the first, it is true that PHP is not alone in having warts. However, the lack of qualitative difference does not mean that the quantitative difference is insignificant. Similarly, problems can be worked around, but languages/environments designed by people with more foresight and, to put it bluntly, clue, simply don't make the kind of really boneheaded architecture mistakes that you can't help but run into on a daily baisis in PHP. Finally, as I noted in my original introduction, with PHP, ...
30 comments
Read more

A review of 6 Python IDEs

(March 2006: you may also be interested the updated review I did for PyCon -- http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html .) For September's meeting, the Utah Python User Group hosted an IDE shootout. 5 presenters reviewed 6 IDEs: PyDev 0.9.8.1 Eric3 3.7.1 Boa Constructor 0.4.4 BlackAdder 1.1 Komodo 3.1 Wing IDE 2.0.3 (The windows version was tested for all but Eric3, which was tested on Linux. Eric3 is based on Qt, which basically means you can't run it on Windows unless you've shelled out $$$ for a commerical Qt license, since there is no GPL version of Qt for Windows. Yes, there's Qt Free , but that's not exactly production-ready software.) Perhaps the most notable IDEs not included are SPE and DrPython. Alas, nobody had time to review these, but if you're looking for a free IDE perhaps you should include these in your search, because PyDev was the only one of the 3 free ones that we'd consider using. And if you aren...
36 comments
Read more