Skip to main content

dlib is not compatibile with numpy 2.x


I spent way too long trying to figure out this problem with dlib while using the Python face_recognition library that wraps it, and since I couldn't find anyone giving the correct diagnosis and solution online, I'm posting it as a public service to the next person who hits it.

Here's the error I was getting:

RuntimeError: Error while calling cudaMallocHost(&data, new_size*sizeof(float)) in file /home/jonathan/Projects/dlib/dlib/cuda/gpu_data.cpp:211. code: 2, reason: out of memory

Eventually I gave up and switched from the GPU model ("cnn") to the CPU one ("hog").  Then I started getting errors about 

RuntimeError: Unsupported image type, must be 8bit gray or RGB image.

The errors persisted after adding PIL code to convert to RGB.

This one was easier to track down on Google: it happens when you have numpy 2.x installed, which is not compatible with dlib.  Seems like something along the way should give a warning about that!

At any rate, with numpy downgraded to the latest 1.x version, the cudaMallocHost error also went away.  I guess something in numpy 2.x is getting interpreted as a Very Large image size value.

Postscript: 

Later on I started getting cudaMallocHost errors again.  These came from using an Image that had not been converted to RGB.  So the unifying theme seems to be "cnn mode doesn't have the same sanity checks enabled that hog does, if you get weird errors you should switch to hog and once it works try cnn again."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Python at Mozy.com

At my day job, I write code for a company called Berkeley Data Systems. (They found me through this blog, actually. It's been a good place to work.) Our first product is free online backup at mozy.com . Our second beta release was yesterday; the obvious problems have been fixed, so I feel reasonably good about blogging about it. Our back end, which is the most algorithmically complex part -- as opposed to fighting-Microsoft-APIs complex, as we have to in our desktop client -- is 90% in python with one C extension for speed. We (well, they, since I wasn't at the company at that point) initially chose Python for speed of development, and it's definitely fulfilled that expectation. (It's also lived up to its reputation for readability, in that the Python code has had 3 different developers -- in serial -- with very quick ramp-ups in each case. Python's succinctness and and one-obvious-way-to-do-it philosophy played a big part in this.) If you try it out, pleas...

A week of Windows Subsystem for Linux

I first experimented with WSL2 as a daily development environment two years ago. Things were still pretty rough around the edges, especially with JetBrains' IDEs, and I ended up buying a dedicated Linux workstation so I wouldn't have to deal with the pain.  Unfortunately, the Linux box developed a heat management problem, and simultaneously I found myself needing a beefier GPU than it had for working on multi-vector encoding , so I decided to give WSL2 another try. Here's some of the highlights and lowlights. TLDR, it's working well enough that I'm probably going to continue using it as my primary development machine going forward. The Good NVIDIA CUDA drivers just work. I was blown away that I ran conda install cuda -c nvidia and it worked the first try. No farting around with Linux kernel header versions or arcane errors from nvidia-smi. It just worked, including with PyTorch. JetBrains products work a lot better now in remote development mod...

A review of 6 Python IDEs

(March 2006: you may also be interested the updated review I did for PyCon -- http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html .) For September's meeting, the Utah Python User Group hosted an IDE shootout. 5 presenters reviewed 6 IDEs: PyDev 0.9.8.1 Eric3 3.7.1 Boa Constructor 0.4.4 BlackAdder 1.1 Komodo 3.1 Wing IDE 2.0.3 (The windows version was tested for all but Eric3, which was tested on Linux. Eric3 is based on Qt, which basically means you can't run it on Windows unless you've shelled out $$$ for a commerical Qt license, since there is no GPL version of Qt for Windows. Yes, there's Qt Free , but that's not exactly production-ready software.) Perhaps the most notable IDEs not included are SPE and DrPython. Alas, nobody had time to review these, but if you're looking for a free IDE perhaps you should include these in your search, because PyDev was the only one of the 3 free ones that we'd consider using. And if you aren...