Skip to main content

One-handed typing?

I separated my right shoulder so that arm is going to be out of commission for a while.  (I am right-handed.)  I'm managing about 25 wpm with one hand, or about 1/4 my normal speed.  This is frustrating.  The Handkey Twiddler has been out of production for a while.  The BAT is not OS X compatible. Anyone tried the Half Qwerty keyboard?  Are there other good options for under, say, $300?  (I found several very niche products for significantly more.)

I do plan to try voice recognition for email and IM but I can't see that working very well for code.

Comments

Anonymous said…
There are right-handed and left-handed dvorak layouts, I think.
Anonymous said…
*one-handed, that is
Anonymous said…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:KB_Dvorak_Left.svg
jester02k said…
I have tried frog pad in the past it works ..ok but I think i just didn't give it enough time.
http://www.frogpad.com/
then there was Matias half keyboard I almost bought it but my hand had healed enough so I didn't buy it but it did look interesting better than the frog pad.
http://www.matias.ca/halfkeyboard/
I know the agravation your going through i was the worst time for me
Good Luck
Anonymous said…
http://blag.xkcd.com/2007/08/14/mirrorboard-a-one-handed-keyboard-layout-for-the-lazy/
Nikhil said…
try Dasher ( http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/dasher/DasherSummary.html ). Even if you don't like it, the technique looks really cool
the daniel said…
I have a frogpad - I find it sufficient, after some practice.
Unknown said…
If you don't mind a little soldering, you could make your own custom one-handed chording keyboard.
mike bayer said…
feel better ! we need your code to keep coming.....
I've flirted with Dvorak in the past and had success with it. Never the 1-handed variety, but it might be worth a shot. It really doesn't take much time to "go back" to a traditional layout.

It took me about 2 weeks to overtake my qwerty speed with dvorak - the only reason I dropped it was I was having to use too many machines that I couldn't control layout over.
Philip Jenvey said…
ouch, get better soon!
Nate75Sanders said…
Kinesis sells some foot pedals/switches that you might find useful -- pedals for modifier keys, maybe, and that way you get to use your left hand entirely for non-modifiers. I've heard of people with 2 healthy limbs/hands using them for emacs chording to fight carpal tunnel.

-- Nate
Anonymous said…
Although it's been awhile since your post, I was curious to see what you decided on. Time for a follow-up post?

A buddy of mine shattered both his wrists in a motorcycle accident and went over to one of these datahand dual hand kbs, http://www.atpm.com/7.05/datahand.shtml and did really well, but they don't seem to be made any more.

And there's the original price tag of $1,000+ (ooch).
Viagra said…
Left-handed people are one of the most discriminated beings in society. Most of all the items are design to be used by right-handed persons.
Peter said…
I know this post is a bit old, but I'll post anyway if anyone out there finds this and is looking for a good one-hand keyboard solution.

I'm the developer of a software-based implementation of this one-hand keyboard concept. It's all software, so no need to buy an expensive hardware keyboard. Use the app with your laptop or your favorite keyboard.

The main advantage is that it uses predictive text. So no need to do the "press a modifier key to get the other letter" thing. Just tap "tges" and it will figure out that the word you want is probably "this".

Give it a try if you've injured your arm/hand/fingers:
http://onehandkeyboard.org

Popular posts from this blog

Why schema definition belongs in the database

Earlier, I wrote about how ORM developers shouldn't try to re-invent SQL . It doesn't need to be done, and you're not likely to end up with an actual improvement. SQL may be designed by committee, but it's also been refined from thousands if not millions of man-years of database experience. The same applies to DDL. (Data Definition Langage -- the part of the SQL standard that deals with CREATE and ALTER.) Unfortunately, a number of Python ORMs are trying to replace DDL with a homegrown Python API. This is a Bad Thing. There are at least four reasons why: Standards compliance Completeness Maintainability Beauty Standards compliance SQL DDL is a standard. That means if you want something more sophisticated than Emacs, you can choose any of half a dozen modeling tools like ERwin or ER/Studio to generate and edit your DDL. The Python data definition APIs, by contrast, aren't even compatibile with other Python tools. You can't take a table definition

Python at Mozy.com

At my day job, I write code for a company called Berkeley Data Systems. (They found me through this blog, actually. It's been a good place to work.) Our first product is free online backup at mozy.com . Our second beta release was yesterday; the obvious problems have been fixed, so I feel reasonably good about blogging about it. Our back end, which is the most algorithmically complex part -- as opposed to fighting-Microsoft-APIs complex, as we have to in our desktop client -- is 90% in python with one C extension for speed. We (well, they, since I wasn't at the company at that point) initially chose Python for speed of development, and it's definitely fulfilled that expectation. (It's also lived up to its reputation for readability, in that the Python code has had 3 different developers -- in serial -- with very quick ramp-ups in each case. Python's succinctness and and one-obvious-way-to-do-it philosophy played a big part in this.) If you try it out, pleas

A review of 6 Python IDEs

(March 2006: you may also be interested the updated review I did for PyCon -- http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html .) For September's meeting, the Utah Python User Group hosted an IDE shootout. 5 presenters reviewed 6 IDEs: PyDev 0.9.8.1 Eric3 3.7.1 Boa Constructor 0.4.4 BlackAdder 1.1 Komodo 3.1 Wing IDE 2.0.3 (The windows version was tested for all but Eric3, which was tested on Linux. Eric3 is based on Qt, which basically means you can't run it on Windows unless you've shelled out $$$ for a commerical Qt license, since there is no GPL version of Qt for Windows. Yes, there's Qt Free , but that's not exactly production-ready software.) Perhaps the most notable IDEs not included are SPE and DrPython. Alas, nobody had time to review these, but if you're looking for a free IDE perhaps you should include these in your search, because PyDev was the only one of the 3 free ones that we'd consider using. And if you aren