Skip to main content

A brief reaction to "Find the Bug"

I picked up a copy of Adam Barr's Find the Bug, which is a cool concept for a book. (5 languages, 50 programs, 50 bugs; see if you can spot them.)

I found the bug in the first program, in C, then skipped to the Python chapter. The first two programs were not too bad, as pedagogical exercises go (although iterating through substrings instead of a.startswith(b) in the 2nd was painful). The third, though, was "Alphabetize words," 25 sloc to perform the equivalent of

def alphabetize(buffer):
  L = buffer.split(' ')
  L.sort()
  return L

... doing everything about the hardest way possible.

Now, it's pretty hard to introduce a non-obvious bug into my version of this function, so it wouldn't be appropriate for Mr. Barr's book when written this way. But the right thing to do is to make the task more difficult, not dumb Python down to the level of C! It's very very painful to read Python written like that.

(Actually it's painful to read any language written at such a low level of expressivity, which is why I prefer not to use languages that really can't do any better.)

Comments

Agileotter said…
You mean like:
return sorted(text.split())
Jonathan Ellis said…
Yes, except the book was written when python 2.2 was the latest, so sorted() wasn't available. And the book's code also just allows space as a word delimiter rather than any whitespace. I was trying to be fair, I guess to the point of pedantry. :)
Anonymous said…
Hi,

I really like your website. I also have a blog about python, http://my-python-blog.freehostia.com/. It's about my adventures concerning my learning of python So anyway, I have a couple tutorial requests. Can you post a tutorial explaining how to make exe, dmg, bin/deb/rpm files? And can you create a tutorial about how to make a simple Jython game?
Thanks,
Yuval
Tim Lesher said…
Q: What happens when you don't read a blog post carefully?
A: You spend five minutes staring at a three-line function, trying to figure out where the bug is.

Nice tip, though.... I'll have to add that book to my "to-read" list.

Popular posts from this blog

Why schema definition belongs in the database

Earlier, I wrote about how ORM developers shouldn't try to re-invent SQL . It doesn't need to be done, and you're not likely to end up with an actual improvement. SQL may be designed by committee, but it's also been refined from thousands if not millions of man-years of database experience. The same applies to DDL. (Data Definition Langage -- the part of the SQL standard that deals with CREATE and ALTER.) Unfortunately, a number of Python ORMs are trying to replace DDL with a homegrown Python API. This is a Bad Thing. There are at least four reasons why: Standards compliance Completeness Maintainability Beauty Standards compliance SQL DDL is a standard. That means if you want something more sophisticated than Emacs, you can choose any of half a dozen modeling tools like ERwin or ER/Studio to generate and edit your DDL. The Python data definition APIs, by contrast, aren't even compatibile with other Python tools. You can't take a table definition

Python at Mozy.com

At my day job, I write code for a company called Berkeley Data Systems. (They found me through this blog, actually. It's been a good place to work.) Our first product is free online backup at mozy.com . Our second beta release was yesterday; the obvious problems have been fixed, so I feel reasonably good about blogging about it. Our back end, which is the most algorithmically complex part -- as opposed to fighting-Microsoft-APIs complex, as we have to in our desktop client -- is 90% in python with one C extension for speed. We (well, they, since I wasn't at the company at that point) initially chose Python for speed of development, and it's definitely fulfilled that expectation. (It's also lived up to its reputation for readability, in that the Python code has had 3 different developers -- in serial -- with very quick ramp-ups in each case. Python's succinctness and and one-obvious-way-to-do-it philosophy played a big part in this.) If you try it out, pleas

A review of 6 Python IDEs

(March 2006: you may also be interested the updated review I did for PyCon -- http://spyced.blogspot.com/2006/02/pycon-python-ide-review.html .) For September's meeting, the Utah Python User Group hosted an IDE shootout. 5 presenters reviewed 6 IDEs: PyDev 0.9.8.1 Eric3 3.7.1 Boa Constructor 0.4.4 BlackAdder 1.1 Komodo 3.1 Wing IDE 2.0.3 (The windows version was tested for all but Eric3, which was tested on Linux. Eric3 is based on Qt, which basically means you can't run it on Windows unless you've shelled out $$$ for a commerical Qt license, since there is no GPL version of Qt for Windows. Yes, there's Qt Free , but that's not exactly production-ready software.) Perhaps the most notable IDEs not included are SPE and DrPython. Alas, nobody had time to review these, but if you're looking for a free IDE perhaps you should include these in your search, because PyDev was the only one of the 3 free ones that we'd consider using. And if you aren