tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post115699148955626149..comments2024-01-12T21:16:50.520-08:00Comments on Spyced: Spyce will not waste your time: authenticationJonathan Ellishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11003648392946638242noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1157098568968998202006-09-01T01:16:00.000-07:002006-09-01T01:16:00.000-07:00The link posted regarding ASP.NET refers to ASP.NE...The link posted regarding ASP.NET refers to ASP.NET 1.1; in ASP.NET 2.0, pre-built login controls are available which require no additional code. This is built on top of the provider model which allows different authentication backendsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1157065896872232532006-08-31T16:11:00.000-07:002006-08-31T16:11:00.000-07:00Thanks, I updated the TG link.Thanks, I updated the TG link.Jonathan Ellishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11003648392946638242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1157065014369121622006-08-31T15:56:00.000-07:002006-08-31T15:56:00.000-07:00karl: thanks for the update; if there is a good do...<I>karl: thanks for the update; if there is a good doc page for this I would be glad to update my link.</I><BR/><BR/>By sheer coincidence, I just updated the TG identity docs yesterday:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/wiki/IdentityManagement" REL="nofollow">http://trac.turbogears.org/turbogears/wiki/IdentityManagement</A>Tim Lesherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02469159188193434861noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1157049493920516742006-08-31T11:38:00.000-07:002006-08-31T11:38:00.000-07:00How does spyce authentication compare with zope?How does spyce authentication compare with zope?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1157038228760515092006-08-31T08:30:00.000-07:002006-08-31T08:30:00.000-07:00zach: the value of sensible defaults is not necess...zach: the value of sensible defaults is not necessarily that you end up writing less code for production -- although much of the Spyce auth defaults are a lot more likely to be useful in production than scaffolding -- but that it lowers the learning curve. Time wasted flailing around trying to understand the steps needed to get started is still time wasted.<BR/><BR/>karl: thanks for the update; if there is a good doc page for this I would be glad to update my link. (That was the best I could google.)Jonathan Ellishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11003648392946638242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1157033634888226452006-08-31T07:13:00.000-07:002006-08-31T07:13:00.000-07:00Note that the TG page you linked to is a year old....Note that the TG page you linked to is a year old. The current steps to the same thing are:<BR/><BR/>1. Create a quickstart project, answer 'yes' to the identity prompt<BR/>2. stick '@identity.require(identity.in_group("admin"))' in front of a method<BR/>3. tg-admin sql create<BR/>4. There is no default user/passwd or groups, so you still have to create those.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1157031261559770832006-08-31T06:34:00.000-07:002006-08-31T06:34:00.000-07:00"Spyce handles the cookies, the login forms and ha..."Spyce handles the cookies, the login forms and handlers, all of the details you shouldn't have to worry about!"<BR/><BR/>Smells like Rails scaffolding. Nice for a demo, impractical in production settings. I suspect that by the time your authentication in Spyce looks and acts the way you need it to, you've written as much code as you would have in Rails (which is still probably not very much).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11683713.post-1156993874232320902006-08-30T20:11:00.000-07:002006-08-30T20:11:00.000-07:00Ouch. I resemble that "solve world hunger" remark...Ouch. I resemble that "solve world hunger" remark. ;-)<BR/><BR/>http://www.plope.com/Members/chrism/decsec_proposal/viewAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com